Test Driving the Nikon 24mm PC-E

May 12th, 2012 § 0 comments § permalink

OK…I know, winter is over…it’s spring time already!  But before we head out to warm sunshine and mild temperatures,   I wanted to share with you some images from Abraham Lake in Alberta that were taken while test driving the Nikon 24mm PC-E.  I would like to clarify however, that this is not a lens review  but simply my first experience in using a tilt shift lens in landscape photography. 

Perspective control or tilt/shift lenses can be used  for several purposes. For landscape photographers,  the main purpose is to control depth of field while maintaining maximum sharpness. Obtaining great depth of field using standard equipment  requires  the use of small apertures such as f/16, f/22 and even f/32 however, traditional depth of field also has limitations depending on your focusing distance to your foreground subject.  Furthermore,  using  small apertures like f/22 and beyond,  reduces the quality  or  sharpness of your image due to diffraction.  What is diffraction?  To be brief, as light passes through your camera’s aperture, the blades of the diaphragm in the lens begin to “bend” or “diffract”  the  light falling on your image sensor.  The smaller your aperture, the greater the diffraction, the softer your image becomes.  Diffraction usually  is negligible up to f/16  but begins to affect your images as you stop down to smaller apertures. The tilt feature of tilt/shift lenses allows the photographer to alter or tilt the plane of focus such that the depth of field required  to render a complete scene in focus is reduced,  hence being able to shoot at  f/13 or even f/11  ultimately eliminating the negative effects of diffraction and maximizing the lens performance.

Bighorn Wildlands, Alberta, Canada

Abraham Lake : Prints Available -Nikon D3S, Nikon 24mm  PC-E  f/3.5, 0.8 sec@ f/13, ISO 100, tripod – (2 image composite, 1 exposure for sky and 2nd exposure for mountain and foreground)

Let my try to explain: In the image of Abraham Lake above,  I tilted my Nikon 24mm PC-E lens such that the focal plane became the ice surface. Now, everything along this plane, the foreground rock, the ice surface and the base of the mountain is in sharp focus.  So how do we get the rest of the image such as the high mountain peaks in focus?  This is where traditional depth of field comes into play.  Since we do not have to account for infinite depth of field, (only the distance from the ice surface to the mountain peaks)  we can use a larger aperture (in this case I used f/13) to render the complete scene in focus.  Clear as mud? Cambridge in Colour gives  a wonderful description on the physics of controlling depth of field with tilt/shift lenses with enough of diagrams and formulas to really get your mind going.  

Bighorn Wildlands, Alberta, Canada

Abraham Lake : Prints Available - Nikon D3S, Nikon 24mm  PC-E   f/3.5, 2.0 sec@ f/13, Singh-Ray LB Polarizer, Singh-Ray 2 stop hard edge graduated neutral density filter, ISO 100, tripod

Even though theses images look sharp here,  they are far from perfect.  In retrospect,  I should have tilted such that the mountain peaks and the foreground subjects  formed the focal plane and then use traditional depth of field to bring the rest of the image in focus. I think this would have made for an overall sharper image.  

Bighorn Wildlands, Alberta, Canada

Abraham Lake : Prints Available - Nikon D3S, Nikon 24mm  PC-E  f/3.5, 2.5 sec@ f/13, Singh-Ray LB Polarizer, Singh-Ray 2 stop hard edge graduated neutral density filter, ISO 100, tripod

Focusing tilt/shift lenses can be tricky.  They are completely manual and every time you change your tilt angle, your focal plane changes so focusing becomes a sort of trial and error process. 

Bighorn Wildlands, Alberta, Canada

Abraham Lake : Prints Available - Nikon D3S, Nikon 24mm  PC-E  f/3.5, 3.0  sec@ f/13, Singh-Ray LB Polarizer, Singh-Ray 2 stop hard edge graduated neutral density filter, ISO 100, tripod

Here is my approach after setting up my composition.

I set my tilt angle to approximate where I want the focal plane.I then focus on the foreground, followed by a focus check on the distant subject. If the distant subject is not in focus,  (it rarely is on the first attempt)  I’ll make a slight adjustment to the tilt angle by rocking it back and forth and finding a middle ground.  I  re-focus on the foreground and check distant subject focus and basically keep repeating the process until I  can no longer see any improvements. I  use live view to set focus through this process. I can zoom in and pull focus more accurately  by using live view than by looking through the tiny viewfinder plus I don’t get so googley-eyed in the process!  Sounds easy doesn’t it?  Well, all I can say is that it is a real test in patience!  

Bighorn Wildlands, Alberta, Canada

Abraham Lake : Prints Available - Nikon D3S, Nikon 24mm  PC-E  f/3.5, 1/25 sec@ f/11, Singh-Ray LB Polarizer, Singh-Ray 2 stop hard edge graduated neutral density filter, ISO  100, tripod

Bighorn Wildlands, Alberta, Canada

Abraham Lake : Prints Available - Nikon D3S, Nikon 24mm  PC-E  f/3.5, 1/3  sec@ f/13, Singh-Ray LB Polarizer, Singh-Ray 2 stop hard edge graduated neutral density filter, ISO 100, tripod

 I have only had the opportunity to play with my tilt/shift once  so I’m sure after some experimentation and using it more and more,  I will become more proficient and accurate with it.  Regardless, it is a lot of fun to use.

I hope you enjoyed the views from Abraham Lake!  You may click on each image to view in full size.

Until next time…

Fab